This one runs as a masterclass: Richard Ronay takes your colleagues through the research and the thinking behind it, with live questions throughout.
Richard Ronay is an assistant professor and currently teaches on issues related to leadership, culture, social intelligence, and conflict resolution at the University of Amsterdam. Prior to relocating to Amsterdam he was based in New York City, where he taught negotiations at Columbia Business School.
All sessions by Richard →Richard provides a deeper insight into the psychological mechanisms with which we choose our leaders. Knowledge about our (unconscious) behaviour offers opportunities to design more effective organisations.
In this session you will learn all about how leaders are chosen in various cultures, or in the animal kingdom. What this means for management of companies and democratic elections and especially what will dramatically increase your chances of being chosen as a leader.
During the expert session, Richard Ronay engages the audience through methods like a Q&A session and using the Mentimeter app for interactive exercises, as he delves into his research on the relationship between confidence and leadership roles. Ronay presents insights from various studies that explore the impact of income inequality on self-enhancement and competition within societies.
Additionally, he shares findings from his research on the US presidential election and the significant role confidence plays in voters' decisions. The audience will have opportunities to discuss these topics and ask questions, making for an enlightening and engaging session.
Gaining insights from Richard Ronay's research, we discover that perceived overconfidence can significantly influence leadership role selection, even if actual abilities are low.
Understanding the crucial role confidence plays in voters' and employers' decisions when selecting leaders, Ronay's findings emphasize the importance of accurately assessing both competence and confidence during the hiring process.
Learning from historical elections like the 2016 US presidential race, we recognize that an arms race for confidence among candidates can lead to less competent individuals being chosen for leadership roles, emphasizing the need for diligent candidate evaluation.
In this expert session, Richard Ronay, an esteemed researcher with a background in experimental social psychology, explores the intriguing relationship between income inequality and leadership selection at various levels – national and organizational. Having studied primate societies, including humans, Richard shares insights into how social structures and competition for power and resources differ between species like baboons and Yanomamo.
Among baboons, the intense competition for alpha status across generations can be attributed to benefits such as access to food, shelter, and mating opportunities. In contrast, horticulturalist societies like the Yanomamo exhibit a culture of violence and aggression, where physical strength and size are essential traits that influence leadership selection.
Richard then discusses how economic inequality impacts individuals' perceptions of their intelligence and kindness in relation to others. His research suggests an association between increasing income inequality and the tendency for individuals to express greater self-enhancement.
Overconfidence, a robust human bias, is also explored as a factor influencing leadership selection processes. Research shows that overconfident individuals are more likely to be selected for leadership roles due to their perceived competence.
However, there is no correlation between self-reported overconfidence and the perceptions of recruiters or interviewers.
Richard continues the session by highlighting the impact of confidence on leadership selections, presenting evidence from various studies, including his research during the 2016 US presidential election. His findings reveal that voters tend to prefer candidates who exude greater confidence, even if their competence levels are low.
This trend is problematic, as it may lead to less qualified individuals being selected for leadership positions due to their perceived confidence. To further investigate this phenomenon, Richard employs agent-based modeling to simulate a series of elections over time and observes an arms race of increasing confidence among candidates, ultimately resulting in the selection of less competent individuals for these roles.
In conclusion, Richard Ronay's expert session sheds light on the complex interplay between confidence and competence in leadership selections. While overconfident individuals may have an advantage during job interviews and elections, they are not necessarily the most qualified candidates.
Employers must be vigilant when assessing candidates to ensure that informed decisions are being made based on both aspects of a candidate's profile – their competence and confidence levels. This session provides valuable insights into the importance of accurately evaluating candidates to select truly capable leaders in various contexts.
No prior knowledge is assumed. It is built for a general working audience, and people who already know the subject get the research and the practical side rather than an introduction. What the hour itself covers: Richard provides a deeper insight into the psychological mechanisms with which we choose our leaders. Knowledge about our (unconscious) behaviour offers opportunities to design more effective organisations.
A masterclass. Richard Ronay takes your colleagues through the subject and the reasoning behind it, and answers live questions. It is practical in what people take away, without the hour turning into an exercise class.
Richard Ronay is one of the experts we auditioned ourselves, and we produce every session so we see how each one lands. Participants rate this session 3.9 out of 5, across 135 responses, and rate Richard personally 3.9 out of 5.
It is interactive, and the block higher up on this page says exactly how for this session. Nobody has to speak up who does not want to: the chat and the polls carry most of it, and the questions can come in anonymously.
It runs 45 min / 15 min: the talk, then live questions. All you do is pick a date. We brief Richard, produce the session, host and moderate it, run the Q&A, and send you the report within an hour of the end.
A team, a department, an employee network or every single employee at once, with no cap and no per-seat price. It runs inside your own Microsoft Teams, Zoom or Google Meet, or on a branded page we build. No integration, no login, no company device or e-mail.
The session is delivered in English. You can add high accuracy live subtitles in 8, 16 or 24 languages, so everyone follows in their own. That is a paid option, priced by the number of languages you need.
No, and that is by design. There is nothing to install, nothing to integrate and no connection to your systems, so there is nothing for IT to validate: we join your own Teams, Zoom or Meet as a guest speaker, or we host a page and your people open a link. No software, no accounts, and no data of yours that we can reach. It is why hundreds of companies, among them some of the largest technology and financial firms in the world, were able to start within a day.
We never receive or hold personal data about your employees. Because the session runs in your own environment, attendance and identity stay with you, and what we report back is aggregated: numbers, ratings and survey answers, not people. That is also why IT approval usually takes minutes rather than weeks.
You keep the recording and can share it internally. You also get attendance over time, participant ratings for the content and the speaker, the survey answers, and the topics your people asked for next.
"People will forget what you said... but people will never forget how you made them feel," - Maya Angelou This hands-on workshop…
Psychological Safety is a well documented driver of high performance in teams and organisations.
How do successful people, teams, and organisations become even more successful?
- Session available on-site only - Sometimes, the way we approach a problem becomes the problem itself, but we may not be aware…
In a world of uncertainty, we cannot always control all the bad things that happen to us, but we can control the way that we…
At this point, the integration of AI in the workplace seems inevitable as many professionals are using it daily.